Reply to Week 4 DQ 2NameUniversity NameReply to Week 4 DQ 21- Amanda,Great post! I agree that the peer review process is maintained as manual because of theincreased possibility of tampering when manuscripts are done digitally (Kelly, Sadeghieh, &Adeli, 2014). Electronic copies of documents can be intercepted and edited before they aredelivered, this can interfere with the process of peer review and endanger the values of scientificcommunication. Another rationale, as noted by Amanda, is that the process has traditionally beenachieved through the post and this has yet to prevent critical issues. Therefore, since the processis not broken and it has been well established over time, it has been deemed reliable and thusscholars have stuck to it.ReferencesKelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014, October 24). Peer Review in Scientific Publications:Benefits, Critiques, & ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
