Principals of Law
Scenario 3
Kendra and Ty had dinner at the Wine Cellar, an upscale
German restaurant. Kendra left her coat with a coatroom
check, but Ty took his
coat to the dining room and hung it on a nearby hook. Upon
leaving, Ty
discovered someone had taken his coat. When Kendra went to
claim her coat at
the coatroom, it could not be found either. The attendant
advised the coat must
have been taken while she was on break. Kendra and Ty sued
the restaurant,
claiming that the restaurant was a bailee of the coats and
had a duty to return
them. Are they both correct? Use principles of law discussed
in this week’s
reading to form a foundation for your response.
Principals of Law
Scenario 3
Kendra and Ty had dinner at the Wine Cellar, an upscale
German restaurant. Kendra left her coat with a coatroom
check, but Ty took his
coat to the dining room and hung it on a nearby hook. Upon
leaving, Ty
discovered someone had taken his coat. When Kendra went to
claim her coat at
the coatroom, it could not be found either. The attendant
advised the coat must
have been taken while she was on break. Kendra and Ty sued
the restaurant,
claiming that the restaurant was a bailee of the coats and
had a duty to return
them. Are they both correct? Use principles of law discussed
in this week’s
reading to form a foundation for your response.
Principals of Law
Scenario 3
Kendra and Ty had dinner at the Wine Cellar, an upscale
German restaurant. Kendra left her coat with a coatroom
check, but Ty took his
coat to the dining room and hung it on a nearby hook. Upon
leaving, Ty
discovered someone had taken his coat. When Kendra went to
claim her coat at
the coatroom, it could not be found either. The attendant
advised the coat must
have been taken while she was on break. Kendra and Ty sued
the restaurant,
claiming that the restaurant was a bailee of the coats and
had a duty to return
them. Are they both correct? Use principles of law discussed
in this week’s
reading to form a foundation for your response.
Principals of Law
Scenario 3
Kendra and Ty had dinner at the Wine Cellar, an upscale
German restaurant. Kendra left her coat with a coatroom
check, but Ty took his
coat to the dining room and hung it on a nearby hook. Upon
leaving, Ty
discovered someone had taken his coat. When Kendra went to
claim her coat at
the coatroom, it could not be found either. The attendant
advised the coat must
have been taken while she was on break. Kendra and Ty sued
the restaurant,
claiming that the restaurant was a bailee of the coats and
had a duty to return
them. Are they both correct? Use principles of law discussed
in this week’s
reading to form a foundation for your response.
